AI Is Causing Student Artists to Rethink Their Creative Career Plans

And Tyler Tran, a Milpitas High School senior who’s planning to major in digital art and animation, is concerned that the popularity of AI art might make his entire career path obsolete, especially when factoring in how expensive an art education tends to be. He worries, “Commissions, digital work — suddenly, of all that could be done with just AI. What am I supposed to do? [I need to] pay for expenses, pay for my loans, pay for life, pay for my college, and stuff like that. So that’s definitely a fear that I have.”

To see for myself what these AI generators are capable of, I decided to try creating my own AI art. The first time I did, I was blown away by how powerful the technology was. To create an image using the most popular AI image generator, Midjourney, all you have to do is type in a text prompt — my prompt was “anime-style portrait of girl with brown hair and gray eyes against a forest backdrop.”Just a few minutes later, the AI generated four different portraits.

Four AI-generated digital images of an anime-style young girl against a forest backdrop.
Midjourney created four detailed portraits in less than two minutes. (Kaitlyn Nguyen/Midjourney)

I was stunned at how good the art was. One portrait had such cinematic lighting, it looked like it could have been from an animated film. Another was more stylized, similar to a still image from a fantasy RPG video game cutscene. Yet another was a more realistic portrait, reminiscent of the kind of illustration you might find on the cover of a novel.

The AI-generated images were all surprisingly detailed. Looking closely, you could see the veins of the leaves, the reflection in the characters’ eyes and the definition on their neck and collarbone. The AI showed a skilled knowledge of light, shadow and proportions.

A single one of these images might take a human artist hours to draw, color and render. The Midjourney AI, on the other hand, completed multiple images in less than two minutes.

This ease and speed of AI image generators have led many companies to use them instead of hiring human artists. AI art is being used to create book covers, album art and even music videos. For example, both the novel cover for Fractal Noise by Christopher Paolini and the music video for “Make Me Feel” by The Chainsmokers were made using AI. As a result, artists — and young people who aspire to become artists — are becoming more and more worried about the future of their profession.

To understand the controversy, it’s helpful to first understand how AI technology works. Most AI image generators function by “learning” from a dataset compiled of countless images across the internet. Vincent Favilla is a psychology professor at Skyline College who is also an artist and AI developer knowledgeable in ChatGPT, GPT-4 and other AI technologies. According to Favilla, AI image generators use “a complex system of matrices and mathematical equations,” known as a neural network, which figures out the relationships between the billions of images and captions that it contains in its dataset. After this, the AI model fuses this knowledge together to generate an image.

Since the AI datasets pull from images online, they also learn from the work of real human artists and become capable of accurately replicating their styles. This has caused quite a backlash. Many artists consider it theft when AI image generators can copy their art style without their consent.

For Favilla, however, it’s an oversimplification to say that AI image generators are stealing images from artists. Since the AI dataset contains billions of images, any single individual’s artwork might make up just a minuscule fraction of that dataset. As of now, Favilla says, it is virtually impossible to use an AI generator to trace and retrieve a specific image. And most AI generators are not fully able to replicate a specific artist’s style.

A faun and a character with a stylized mushroom cap head dance in the forest.
One of Mo Koelle’s digital art pieces depicts a faun and a mushroom-head character dancing in the forest. (Mo Koelle)

Koelle, the aforementioned student artist, is one of those who worry about protecting the rights of artists. And though they are not completely against the technology, they ultimately feel that AI generators are “not so much a tool for inspiration as it is a tool for making a product.” While AI has the potential to help artists, Koelle says, “There’s a line between using AI to assist you and to do all the work for you.” And while these AI generators are able to create beautiful pieces, they still rely on humans to input an idea. They aren’t fully capable of coming up with their own unique ideas with personal meaning behind them.

AI image generators have other limitations as well. For instance, they struggle with drawing hands and complex human anatomy and with writing coherent text. Sometimes the results create an uncanny valley effect.

Misha Chaturabul, a Milpitas High School student with a passion for drawing, painting and digital art, says she would like to do art as a side job in the future. According to Chaturabul, “Real artists’ work is made with a genuine passion and love that cannot be replicated by a computer or a type of technology.” She believes that the time and effort that a human artist puts into each piece gives it a special quality — a human spirit or essence that’s able to evoke emotions — which AI cannot reproduce.

Color sketches of five young women showing various emotions — annoyed, dozing off, etc.
Digital sketches by Misha Chaturabul, who believes that human-created art has a special ‘spirit or essence’ — and an emotional resonance — that AI cannot emulate. (Courtesy of Misha Chaturabul)

Tran also believes art is a uniquely human way of communicating and expressing feelings. “While AI art can have a vague sense of this, there’s something about the personal way that individual artists give a piece of themselves whenever they’re making art,” he explains. “I think we’re kind of jumping from the process, because the process is just as important as the end product.”

For him, the idea of having to compete with AI in addition to other artists feels especially brutal. “We’re really approaching this very modernized, ‘oh, everything must be efficient’ route,” he says. “And I think that’s so terrible, because it’s really just cutting corners. It’s only profiting big companies.”

Tran’s hope is that AI doesn’t completely take over the art industry in the future. “I think there is a point where AI art has its limits, and I hope its limits stay there,” he says.

Digital illustration of a boy lying down, surrounded by whimsical doodles.
‘Another Day, by Tyler Tran, depicts the sense of burnout that the artist feels when he thinks about making a career out of art — but also the joy he felt when creating doodles for fun as a kid. (Tyler Tran)

People like Favilla, on the other hand, have a more optimistic view of the technology.

“I have more ideas than I do time,” the professor says. AI art allows him to realize his ideas more quickly than he would be able to do using traditional illustration methods. The technology can generate ideas that artists can use as inspiration for their own pieces. Moreover, because the AI tools are so accessible, they allow people who don’t have a lot of artistic talent or physical strength to still be able to create beautiful artwork. All you need is a good imagination and creativity.

In other words, maybe AI software is just another medium that artists can use to express themselves.

Sign up to receive the best Underground art & real estate news in your inbox everyday.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

This post was originally published on this site be sure to check out more of their content.